The aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo attacks was a good time to watch the left devour itself. Some radicals, myself included, pointed out the magazine’s long history of Islamophobic and antisemitic caricatures, and suggested that, though the attack was tragic and indefensible, lionizing an Orientalist magazine was probably a poor choice. Many other radicals––most of them older, white, European Marxists––responded very harshly to the charges of racism levied at Charlie Hebdo. They accused the magazine’s critics of taking certain cartoons out of context (a fair criticism), of not understanding French politics (also a fair criticism), and of indulging “petty bourgeois identity politics” (a less fair criticism). Continue reading
- Revisiting Charlie Hebdo: “Afflicting the Afflicted” and “Petty Bourgeois Identity Politics”
- Is Raising the Minimum Wage Worth the Effort?
- Why Customers Are Assholes: An Ideological Explanation
- A Quick Word on Charlie Hebdo and Martyrdom
- “Can’t Shake the Devil’s Hand:” Arguing With Bigots on the Internet
Marcia Reinhard on Revisiting Charlie Hebdo: “Aff… Asher Wycoff on Is Raising the Minimum Wage Wo… FRUIT CAKE on Is Raising the Minimum Wage Wo… Asher Wycoff on Neo-Nazis and Free Speech StephenMeansMe on Neo-Nazis and Free Speech